Original question: Hi List, I have been working on geocoding our streets for the whole city and everything is turning out really well. The one exception is some new sub-divisions of single family homes all with the same address, but different unit numbers. Does anyone have a work-around so that all 90 homes is this sub-division are not represented by a single address? It is much the same problem with apartments, but at least there is a dot that represents each building, where in this case, there is a separate building for each unit. Any suggestions would be appreciated (using ArcView 3.2, 8.1 or ArcInfo). Sum: Seems more people had the same question then an answer. I did get one reply from Scott Kutz that gave me the direction of how to tackle this problem (THANKS!). As far as I can tell, there is no easy solution, and quite a bit of data manipulation to get this working long-term. The procedure that I used was to create an alias table ("Working with place name aliases", in ArcView help.) ArcView first looks at the alias table and translates the incoming address to its alias value (another street address) prior to actually attempting the geocode. The table has two columns, Alias, and address. For me, the table looked something like: Alias (actual address) Address (this is the new address) 10700 Kimblewyck Cir 101 110 Kimblewyck Cir 10700 Kimblewyck Cir 102 120 Kimblewyck Cir . . . . In our case, I had to renumber the whole subdivision because odd and even ran on both sides. I did this somewhat arbitrarily, but renumbered by 10's, odd on one side and even on the other (this part I did just on a piece of paper that had all the houses on it). Then, I went back into the streets coverage, and renumbered, the from/to addresses to fit my new numbering system. Finally, when setting up the "geocode addresses..." function, I selected the alias table I had created, and ArcView then runs through the alias as a lookup before it geocodes. Although there is a lot of work up-front, it should solve the problem for all future geocode runs. The only real problem now, is that this will unlikely work in ArcExplorer for our users in the office that are not running ArcView. Good thing our city is landlocked so we don't have much left to deal with on all the planners new "communities", that are generally GIS IN-compatible. If anyone has any questions on these procedures, feel free to drop me a line. Jill Jill Wolf GIS Technician City of Northglenn 11701 Community Center Dr. Northglenn, CO 80501 ph. 303-450-8989 fax 303-450-8708